Your data. Your choice.

If you select «Essential cookies only», we’ll use cookies and similar technologies to collect information about your device and how you use our website. We need this information to allow you to log in securely and use basic functions such as the shopping cart.

By accepting all cookies, you’re allowing us to use this data to show you personalised offers, improve our website, and display targeted adverts on our website and on other websites or apps. Some data may also be shared with third parties and advertising partners as part of this process.

TP-Link Archer MR400
EUR77,32

TP-Link Archer MR400


Question about TP-Link Archer MR400

avatar
Anonymous

7 years ago

TP-LINK Archer MR400 or better the Huawei B525S-23A? What are the advantages and disadvantages? I would use the LTE router with a Salt sim in a 5 room flat....

Avatar
avatar
tomjacob

7 years ago

TP-LINK always delivers promising products to its customers. I think there is a useful Survey for all the tp link customers at https://patronsurvey.com/.
avatar
Shogalin

7 years ago • purchased this product

purchased this product
I switched from the Archer MR400 to the Huawei B525S-23A after I kept having strange dropouts with the TP-Link and had to restart. With the Huawei everything now runs tip-top - clear recommendation for it, respectively against the MR400!
avatar
Stardustone

3 years ago

The MR400 can only download 150 Mbit, so I wouldn't recommend it. A better choice would be the Archer MR600, because it can download up to a maximum of 300 Mbit and has 4 x 1 Gbit LAN connections. However, the reception performance of the MR devices is not that great, so it is advantageous to place the devices very close to a window. The MR600 could also be expanded with additional mesh extensions for better WLAN in the home.
avatar
Former user

7 years ago

You are helping the company improve its service offerings by participating in the survey.
https://mcdvoicecom.club/